Flashback: What Judge Predicted Will Happen after Supreme Court Sacked Emeka Ihedioha as Imo Governor

One of many stunning issues that occurred within the Nigerian political area in 2020 was the sack of Emeka Ihedioha because the governor of Imo state.

On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 the Unbiased Nationwide Electoral Fee (INEC) issued a certificate of return to the then Imo state governor-elect, Ihedioha.

In January 2020, the Supreme Courtroom ordered INEC to withdraw the certificates of return issued to Ihedioha and challenge a contemporary one to Hope Uzodimma.
Picture credit: Hope Uzodimma, Emeka Ihedioha
Supply: Fb

Based on INEC, Ihedioha polled 273,404 whereas Uche Nwosu of the Motion Alliance (AA) polled 190,364 votes. The All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA)’s candidate, Ifeanyi Ararume, polled 114,676 whereas APC’s Uzodimma got here fourth with 96,458 votes.

Nonetheless, on Tuesday, January 14, 2020, a seven-member panel of the Supreme Courtroom ordered the electoral physique to withdraw the certificate of return issued to Ihedioha, candidate of the Peoples Democratic Get together (PDP).

The apex courtroom additionally ordered INEC to challenge a contemporary one to Hope Uzodimma, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) who the courtroom declared because the winner of the March 9, 2019 governorship election.

Read also

Anambra election 2021: Tribunal relocates sittings to Ilorin

How did it occur?

Uzodimma had challenged the election of Ihedioha from the tribunal to the apex courtroom degree, searching for to be declared because the winner of the election.

He had argued that INEC wrongfully excluded the outcomes of 388 polling models the place he reportedly garnered excessive votes.

Whereas Uzodimma had misplaced on the tribunal and the attraction courtroom, the tenacious APC candidate finally obtained a beneficial judgment the place it issues most; the apex courtroom.

The apex courtroom agreed with Uzodimma that about 230,695 votes have been illegally excluded from 388 polling models.

The courtroom, subsequently dominated that the excluded votes be added, resulting in Uzodinma having nearly all of the lawful votes forward of Ihedioha and others.

Ihedioha kicks, asks Supreme Courtroom to evaluation its choice

Read also

Anambra election: Uba plans appeal of disqualification as APC candidate over illegal primary

Being the apex courtroom within the nation, there was no different courtroom Ihedioha may go to problem the ruling.

Nonetheless, he opted to take the one possibility obtainable; he filed an software asking the identical courtroom to evaluation its choice and set it apart.

Within the judgment delivered on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, six out of the seven-member panel of the apex courtroom led by Ibrahim Muhammad, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), dismissed Ihedioha’s review application.

Studying the bulk judgement, Olukayode Ariola mentioned:

“The finality of the supreme courtroom is entrenched within the structure. Inherent powers can solely be evoked if there’s a lacking hyperlink and that’s the reason typically the courtroom might be known as upon to dot the i and cross the t.

“The finality of the supreme courtroom in civil instances is remaining.”

The dissenting judgement and the prediction

Nonetheless, Chima Nweze, one of many seven judges, disagreed with the ruling, The Cable reported.

Read also

Breaking: Court nullifies Andy Uba’s participation in Anambra poll

In his dissenting judgment, Nweze requested the courtroom to put aside the January 14 judgment that eliminated Ihedioha from workplace, describing it as a nullity and in unhealthy religion.

He held that Uzodimma misled the courtroom into an unjust conclusion with the unverified votes in 388 polling models.

The decide subsequently predicted that apex courtroom’s verdict sacking Ihedioha will hang-out Nigeria.

His phrases:

“This choice of the supreme courtroom will proceed to hang-out our electoral jurisprudence for a very long time to come back.

“In my intimate studying of the January 14 judgment, the substance of Ihedioha’s matter was misplaced to time-frame. This courtroom as soon as put aside its personal earlier judgment and subsequently can not use time-frame to extinguish the suitable of any individual.

“This courtroom has powers to overrule itself and may revisit any choice not in accordance with justice. This courtroom has an obligation of redeeming its picture. I’m of the view that this software ought to succeed.

Read also

Breaking: Supreme Court upholds ex-SAN Nwobike’s appeal

“I hereby make an order setting apart the choice of this courtroom made on January 14 and that the certificates of return issued to the appellant be returned to INEC. I additionally make an order restoring the respondents as winner of the March 9 governorship election.”

The Supreme Courtroom governor

Because of how he emerged as Imo governor, many, particularly his critics, began describing Uzodimma as “Supreme Courtroom governor”.

Nonetheless, the Imo state governor described people calling him a Supreme Court governor as ignorant.

The governor who made the assertion throughout an interview on Channels TV on Friday, September 25, 2020, argued that he emerged as governor of the state via legit means.

He identified that he was not the primary individual to have been favoured by a Supreme Courtroom ruling, describing it as the peak of ignorance to consult with him like that.

Supply: Legit.ng

Source link

Flashback: What Judge Predicted Will Happen after Supreme Court Sacked Emeka Ihedioha as Imo Governor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to top